Objective: To evaluate the role that various porcelain veneers play in the cosmetic repair of anterior teeth. Methods: Eighty clients who got aesthetic anterior tooth replacement in our institution between January 2021 and December 2022 were chosen as the research subjects after the case data were retrospectively examined. According to the methods of porcelain veneer, they were separated into a controlling team (traditional all-ceramic veneer repair technology, n=40) and an observation group (minimally invasive all-ceramic veneer repair technology, n=40), and followed up to 6 months after the restoration. Efficacy, aesthetic restoration effect (restoration integrity, marginal adaptability, gingival health, color matching, tooth sensitivity), patient satisfaction with restoration aesthetics (color matching, comfort, shape), dental bone related indicators (new bone contour, bone density, vertical absorption of alveolar bone), the occurrence of complications (wearing discomfort, prosthesis loosening, veneer deformation/discoloration, periodontitis) of patients in the two groups were compared, and periodontal conditions [periodontal pockets (PD), gingival bleeding (BI), gingival redness (AL)] of clients in the two teams prior to and 6 months after restoration were contrasted, the effect and function of different porcelain veneers on the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth were evaluated. Results: The observational team's overall therapy effectiveness rate was 95.00%, which was considerably greater than the controlling team's rate of 80.00% ( P <0.05). The grade A proportions of restoration integrity, marginal adaptability, gum health, color matching, and tooth sensitivity of clients in the observational team were 87.50%, 92.50%, 90.00%, 87.50%, and 90.00%, which were considerably higher than those in the controlling team (65.00%, 75.00%, 72.50%, 67.50%, 70.00%) ( P <0.05). Clients in the observational team had substantially greater bone density and new bone contour than those in the controlling team, and their alveolar bone's vertical absorption was much less than that of the controlling team ( P <0.05). The levels of PD, BI, and AL in clients in the observational team were lower than those in the controlling team six months after repair ( P <0.05). Clients in the observational team reported considerably greater levels of color matching, comfort, and aesthetic contentment than those in the controlling team ( P <0.05). Clients in the observational team experienced complications at a rate of 10%, which was much lower than the controlling team's rate of 27.50% ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Minimally invasive all-ceramic veneer restoration technology has a better curative effect in the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth, which can greatly improve the aesthetic restoration effect, reduce the damage to the periodontal, and can improve the dental bone density, new bone contour, and vertical absorption of alveolar bone, reduce the incidence of complications, improve patient satisfaction, and can be popularized and applied.