« Go back to issue 47(5) summary

The effect of trauma type on the severity of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms

Ayşegül Taşdelen Kul1, Ibrahim Gündoğmuş1

1 Department of Psychiatry, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara/Turkey.

 

Received: 27/03/2019 – Accepted: 07/08/2020

DOI: 10.1590/0101-60830000000249

Abstract

Objective: The high prevalence of trauma exposure calls for detailed research on how trauma type affects the development of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the effects of the type of trauma on the severity of symptoms, anxiety, depression, and dissociative experiences in the PTSD patient population. Method: The sample of the study consists of 80 volunteer PTSD patients (20 sexual trauma, 20 work accidents, 20 traffic accidents and 20 combat related trauma). Once the severity of symptoms was determined in all subjects by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were applied. Results: A statistically significant difference were found between trauma types with regard to age, time without treatment, and the total and subscale scores obtained in DES and CAPS. It was found that in the group that has PTSD diagnosis related to sexual trauma, the length of the time without treatment, DES and CAPS scores were higher than the rest. Conclusion: The study we conducted showed that PTSD continued more severe and resistant after a sexual trauma. Moreover, specific type of trauma was significant in PTSD patients.

Kul AT et al. / Arch Clin Psychiatry. 2020;47(5):135-139

Keywords: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), trauma type, severity, sexual trauma.

Introduction

In the general population, lifelong trauma exposure  shows  a  high prevalence of 70-89%1-3. Nevertheless, trauma-induced psychopathologies such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are reported at a much lower rate of about 8.3%2. The development of PTSD is associated with the meaning of victim assigns to the trauma and individual differences4,5. While most PTSD patients recover in a few months without any intervention, some patients have to deal with symptoms for years6. As the clinical prognosis of PTSD very variable, researchers decided to investigate the clinical presentation of the type and number of traumas; whether these had any effect on the diagnosis of PTSD7. Given the evidence, traumatic events could lead to to other psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety in addition to PTSD. These were important to clarify the relation of traumatic experiences and symptoms of the PTSD5,7,8. Furthermore, it was required to investigate the types of trauma affected the severity of the symptoms such as depression, anxiety and dissociative experiences in PTSD patients. In a study conducted with a sample of 602 people in 2018, Guina et al. compared the trauma types with PTSD severity. The same study identified more severe symptoms in PTSD cases due to post war period and sexual traumas9. Smith et al. also compared severity of trauma types with PTSD symptoms, as well as comorbid anxiety and depression. They found that symptom severity and comorbid psychiatric disorders were higher in PTSD patients who experienced sexual trauma. In Turkey, the relationship between the trauma types and symptom severity was studied in PTSD patients and the comparison of PTSD patient groups with sexual and non-sexual traumas, showed more severe symptoms in the former group10. This study investigated the hypothesis that the type of trauma would have an impact on the severity and variety of psychiatric symptoms. Then, the population of PTSD patients was screened to identify any relation between the trauma types and symptom severity, as well as comorbid psychiatric symptoms (anxiety, depression and dissociative experiences).

Method

Sample

Study sample consisted of 80 PTSD patients who were treated and followed-up in the Gülhane Training and Research Hospital from May 2017 through July 2018. The diagnosis of PTSD was made by two experienced psychiatrists according to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5)11. In accordance with the hypothesis of the study, the first 20 patients with inclusion criteria for each type of trauma were included in the study. The study included 20 cases of PTSD developed due to sexual trauma, 20 cases developed after work accidents, 20 after traffic accidents, and a final 20 related to traumas developed in military conflict. Only patients who applied psychiatry for the first time, having no treatment and therefore diagnosed as PTSD for the first time were included in the study. The primary psychopathology of all subjects were PTSD. All subjects participated voluntarily and they were all above 18 years old, none of them having psychotic and/or affective disorders diagnosis, mental retardation, head trauma, or organic psychiatric disorders and whole patients displayed the cognitive functions required to complete the study. The study started with the approval of local ethics committee. All rights of the study subjects and all stages of the study are protected under the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Design

All subjects were duly informed about the study and their signed consents were obtained. Psychiatrists cross-referenced  patients for a reconciliation of diagnoses with DSM-5 criteria. Subjects were included in the study only when both psychiatrists accepted the diagnosis. Detailed histories of trauma were obtained through interviews and the clinician applied the PTSD scale. Moreover, all subjects completed a sociodemographic data sheet, in addition to Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). All data were analyzed under the appropriate data set.

Data collection tools

Sociodemographic Data Sheet: Sociodemographic data of all study subjects, such as age, gender, marital status, employment status, socioeconomic status and education are recorded in this sheet.

Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a scale developed by Blake et al. in 1990 to be applied by clinicians in order to determine the frequency and severity of PTSD symptoms12. Tamer et al. validated the Turkish version in 199913. The scale comprises 17 questions designed to evaluate PTSD symptoms and 8 to evaluate the symptoms accompanying PTSD. It is a scale between 0-136, with scores increasing in number as the severity of PTSD increases. Furthermore, it has subscales of ‘re-experiencing,’ ‘avoidance and blunting’ and ‘hyper-arousal.’

DES is a self-report questionnaire with 28 items developed by Bernstain and Putnam to measure the frequency of dissociative experiences14. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-100 and an average score is obtained. A score of 30 or above suggests the presence of a dissociative disorder. The Turkish validity and reliability were confirmed by Şar et al. 15.

BDI was developed by Beck et al. in 1988 to assess the severity of depressive symptoms16. It is a Likert type self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 21 items to be scored on a scale of 0-63. The score increases with the severity of depression. It investigates the symptoms of depression related to cognitive, emotional, physical, and motor functions. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Hisli et al. 17.

BAI was developed by Beck et al. to assess the severity of anxiety18. It is a self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 21 items to be scored on a scale of 0-63. Each item is scored between from 0-3 in the Likert type. High scores indicate an increased severity of anxiety. The Turkish validity and reliability study was performed by Ulusoy et al. in 199319.

Statistical Analysis

The descriptive statistics of the sociodemographic datas were obtained from patients shown as mean ± standard deviation in number (percentage). Chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical data between groups. After checking the consistency of continuous variables for normal distribution, two continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Withney U test for those meeting the non-parametric analysis criteria and Kruskall- Walls Test was used for comparison where there were more than two continuous variables. Statistical analysis was performed with the software SPSS 20.0 for Windows and ≤0.05 was taken as a statistically significant value.

Results

Descriptive sociodemographic datas of study subjects were presented in Table 1. The mean age of the subjects were 33.61 ± 7.01 years and 37 (46.3%) were female. Approximately half were married (42, 52.5%) and again half were in employment (43, 53.8%).

Table 2 shows the average and compared values of the clinical scales according to the types of traumas that the study subjects had experienced. According to this, there are statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age, time without treatment, DES, and the total and subscale scores of PTSD-T (p values are 0.041, <0.001, <0.001, 0.029, 0.019, 0.006 and 0.016, respectively). Figure 1 is a graphical representation of mean values. PTSD patients with a history of sexual trauma scored statistically higher in BDI, DES, CAPS avoidance/blunting, CAPS hyper-arousal and CAPS total than the subjects who developed PTSD following a work accident (p values are 0.013, <0.001, 0.020, 0.001, and 0.017, respectively). PTSD patients with history of sexual trauma scored statistically higher in DES, CAPS re-experiencing, CAPS avoidance/blunting, CAPS hyper-arousal and CAPS total compared to subjects who developed PTSD following a traffic accident (p values are <0.001, 0.023, 0.020, 0.002, and 0.001, respectively). PTSD patients with history of sexual trauma scored statistically higher in DES, CAPS avoidance/blunting and CAPS total than those who developed PTSD following a military trauma (p values are <0.001, 0.012, and 0.045, respectively). Subjects who developed PTSD following a work accident scored statistically higher in CAPS re-experiencing than  those who  developed PTSD following a traffic accident (p value is 0.004). Subjects who developed PTSD following a military trauma and those following a traffic accident showed no difference in BDI, BAI, DES and CAPS scores.

Discussion

The main aim of this study was to determine how the type of trauma affected PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, and dissociative experiences. The most important result of the study were that symptom severity, time without treatment, and dissociative experiences that were found, significantly higher in PTSD patients with a history of sexual trauma in accordance with the existing literature7,10,20,21. As for the severity of anxiety and depression, no significant difference were found according to the type of trauma. Our study is also considering that research is rather limited in Turkey on the relations between the types of trauma inducing PTSD and the severity of symptoms, anxiety, depression, and dissociative experiences.

Table 2. Aggression status comparison between patients diagnosed with ASPD with a comorbidity of substance use disorder and healthy participants

Figure 1. Graphic representation of the time without treatment, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Dissociative Experiences Scale and CAPS scale according to types of trauma

Table 2. Aggression status comparison between patients diagnosed with ASPD with a comorbidity of substance use disorder and healthy participants

Table 1: Descriptive sociodemographic data on the study subjects

Table 2. Aggression status comparison between patients diagnosed with ASPD with a comorbidity of substance use disorder and healthy participants

Table 2: Average and compared values of the clinical scales according to the types of trauma the study subjects experienced.

Table 2. Aggression status comparison between patients diagnosed with ASPD with a comorbidity of substance use disorder and healthy participants

Table 3: Paired comparison of the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Dissociative Experiences Scale and CAPS according to types of trauma.

In line with the existing literature, our study showed that the symptom severity of re-experiencing, avoidance/blunting, hyper- arousal and dissociative experiences in PTSD patients with a history of sexual trauma was higher than other types of trauma7,20,21. In a recent study with a sample size of 2463, Jacop et al. found that sexual trauma had a greater risk of PTSD and a higher symptom severity22. Similarly, Kelley et al. and Smith et al. showed that PTSD following a sexual trauma was associated with a higher symptom severity7,20. On the other hand, Müller et al. concluded that remission took more time and effort in PTSD patients with a history of sexual trauma23. In Turkey, the study by Çoban et al. also shows that PTSD related to sexual trauma displayed more severe symptoms10. The primary reason for this higher severity in symptoms of PTSD induced by sexual trauma might be that the trauma is directly related to the person in such cases. This suggests a difference in terms of meaning between a trauma experienced accidentally and a pre-meditated one targeting a specific person. Moreover, it is perpetrated against the sexual existence of the person which cannot be modified and/ or fortified. In other words, in another type of trauma it is possible to change or control traumatic risk factors afterwards, whereas this is not the case following a sexual trauma. Another possible cause is the existence of a certain risk at all times in the circumstances where other types of trauma (e.g. work accidents, traffic accidents, etc.) develop. On the contrary, sexual trauma is unexpected and unprepared for, regardless of the environment and this is a possible factor contributing to a cognition of helplessness. This increases the risk and severity of PTSD after a sexual trauma. Another factor is the possibility of other types of trauma (e.g. physical violence, restriction, humiliation) accompanying the sexual trauma experienced, which would contribute to the cumulative effect to increase the severity of the disorder24. Finally, it is shown that peritraumatic reactions in sexual traumatic events play an important role in the risk for development and worse response to treatment. The peritraumatic reaction involving tonic immobility is much more common in sexual trauma victims and could mediate the association with greater severity of symptoms25. The fact that no statistical difference in symptom severity was identified in patients experiencing PTSD for reasons other than sexual trauma lends more weight to the possible causes discussed above.

Another important finding in our study was that the time without treatment was higher in PTSD patients with a history of sexual trauma26. We suggest that the most probable cause is that patients do not seek treatment for a long time out of fear of shaming and stigmatization. However, factors such as threat and possible harm should not be discarded. Moreover, as the age of sexual trauma patients is relatively young may indicate a hesitation about how to proceed in the search for treatment. Delay in treatment, however, will make the disorder and its symptoms more resistant. In addition, in our study, we found that PTSD patients with sexual trauma were younger than other trauma types, in accordance with the literature10. This may be a reason for patients having more severe symptomatology. Because, even in mentally healthy individuals, the effects of early traumas have been shown to leave deeper traces on the individual27. Considering the fact that the group with sexual trauma is young and the duration of without treatment is long, it may suggest that it is associated with gruesome and associated with worse symptomatology10,26.

The findings of our study should be evaluated with some reservations. First of all, premorbid factors likely to affect the development and severity of PTSD were not taken into consideration. It should be noted that these factors can affect the severity of trauma. Another limitation is that other possible traumas accompanying the sexual trauma were not studied. Furthermore, the fact that the types of trauma were not evaluated according to being incidental or personal adds another limitation to the study results. The study was sectional, cases were not controlled for duration of treatment. It could be a confounding variable. Finally, it is worth remembering that the sample size was limited and some scales were based on self-reporting.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study conducted with a group of PTSD patients in Turkey showed that PTSD related to sexual trauma was more severe and resistant. It also suggests that patients with sexual trauma are younger and have longer treatment time. The findings of the study were discussed in line with the existing literature on the subject. We think that with our study, we draw attention to the type of trauma and the importance of the time spent without treatment in PTSD patients. The study have shown that these features may be associated with worse symptomatology. We hope that our study will contribute to the future studies aimed at reducing the long-term non-treatment duration and related to the type of trauma, in PTSD patients with sexual trauma.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

1.0Benjet C, Bromet E, Karam EG, Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Ruscio AM, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: results from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Psychol Med. 2016; 46: 327-43.

2. Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Milanak ME, Miller MW, Keyes KM, Friedman MJ. National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM‐IV and DSM‐5 criteria. J Trauma Stress. 2013; 26: 537-47.

3. Overstreet C, Berenz EC, Kendler KS, Dick DM, Amstadter AB. Predictors and mental health outcomes of potentially traumatic event exposure. Psychiatry Res. 2017; 247: 296-304.

4. Lancaster SL, Melka SE, Rodriguez BF. A factor analytic comparison of five models of PTSD symptoms. J Anxiety Disord. 2009; 23: 269-74.

5. Smoller JW. The genetics of stress-related disorders: PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 41: 297.

6. Ehlers A, Clark DM. A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2000; 38: 319-45.

7. Smith HL, Summers BJ, Dillon KH, Cougle JR. Is worst-event trauma type related to PTSD symptom presentation and associated features? J Anxiety Disord. 2016; 38: 55-61.

8. Gündüz A, Yaşar AB, Gündoğmuş İ, Konuk E. Adverse Childhood Events Turkish Form: validity and reliability study. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2018; 19: 68-75.

9. Guina J, Nahhas RW, Sutton P, Farnsworth S. The influence of trauma type and timing on PTSD symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018; 206: 72-6.

10. Çoban DA, Gündoğmuş İ. Comparison of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom profile according to sexual and non-sexual trauma types. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019; 20: 460-67.

11. Birliği AP, Tanısal RB. Beşinci Baskı (DSM-5), Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru Elkitabı’ndan, çev. Köroğlu E, Hekimler Yayın Birliği, Ankara. 2013.

12. Weathers F, Blake D, Schnurr P, Kaloupek D, Marx B, Keane T. The clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Interview available from the National Center for PTSD at www ptsd va gov. 2013.

13. Aker AT, Özeren M, Başoğlu M, Kaptanoğlu C, Erol A, Buran B. Clinician-Administered Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale (CAPS): A validity and reliability study. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 1999;10:286-93.

14. Bernstein EM, Putnam FW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986;174(12): 727-35.

15. Şar V, Kundakçı T, Kızıltan E. Dissosiyatif Yaşantılar Ölçeğinin (DES-II) geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. 33. Ulusal Psikiyatri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Antalya. 1997: 55-64.

16. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988; 8: 77-100.

17. Hisli N. A reliability and validity study of Beck Depression Inventory in a university student sample. J Psychol. 1989; 7: 3-13.

18. Beck AT, Steer R. Beck anxiety inventory (BAI). BiB 2010. 1988; 54.

19. Ulusoy M, Sahin NH, Erkmen H. the Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric Properties. Journal of cognitive psychotherapy. 1998; 12: 2.

20. Kelley LP, Weathers FW, McDevitt‐Murphy ME, Eakin DE,Flood AM. A comparison of PTSD symptom patterns in three types of civilian trauma. J Trauma Stress. 2009; 22: 227-35.

21. Lancaster SL, Melka SE, Rodriguez BF. An examination of the differential effects of the experience of DSM-IV defined traumatic events and life stressors. J Anxiety Disord. 2009; 23: 711-17.

22. Jakob JM, Lamp K, Rauch SA, Smith ER, Buchholz KR. The impact of trauma type or number of traumatic events on PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity in treatment seeking veterans. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2017; 205: 83-6.

23. Müller M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rodgers S, Kleim B, Seifritz E, Vetter S, et al. Predictors of remission from PTSD symptoms after sexual and non-sexual trauma in the community: A mediated survival-analytic approach. Psychiatry Res. 2018; 260: 262-71.

24. Karam EG, Friedman MJ, Hill ED, Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Petukhova M, et al. Cumulative traumas and risk thresholds: 12‐month PTSD in the World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Depress Anxiety. 2014; 31: 130-42.

25. Kalaf J, Coutinho ESF, Vilete LMP, Luz MP, Berger W, Mendlowicz M, et al. Sexual trauma is more strongly associated with tonic immobility than other types of trauma–A population based study. Journal of affective disorders. 2017; 215: 71-6.

26. Nöthling J, Simmons C, Suliman S, Seedat S. Trauma type as a conditional risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder in a referred clinic sample of adolescents. Compr Psychiatry. 2017; 76: 138-46.

27. Gunduz A, Gundogmus İ, Engin BH, Işler A, Sertcelik S, Yasar AB. Effects of adverse childhood events over metacognitions, rumination, depression and worry in healthy university students. Ann Med Res. 2019; 26: 1394-401.